Monthly Archives: May 2013

Sixth Circuit Breathes New Life Into Royalty Spat

In Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, the Sixth Circuit considered a putative class action complaint brought for breach of contract and other related claims concerning alleged breaches of mineral leases.  The district court had dismissed the contractual claims based on Ohio’s statute of limitations, and that was the only basis of the plaintiffs’ appeal, as they … Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Revives Securities Class Action

Creating a split with the Second and Ninth Circuits, the Sixth Circuit has held that Section 11 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77k, which creates liability for false statements in registration statements, provides for strict liability and so does not require allegations of knowledge of falsity.  The panel in Ind. State Dist. Council … Continue Reading

Pair of Criminal Cases from Sixth Circuit Gather Headlines

Yesterday, a pair of criminal cases emanating from the Sixth Circuit received headlines.  In McQuiggin v. Perkins, the Supreme Court reviewed another habeas case from the Sixth Circuit concerning the actual innocence exception to AEDPA.  Although the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Sixth Circuit’s decision applying the actual innocence exception to the statute of limitations, … Continue Reading

Another Supreme Court Habeas Reversal

In Metrish v. Lancaster, a unanimous Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit’s decision that Michigan courts violated due process when they took away a defendant’s diminished-capacity defense before his second trial, after having allowed it in his first trial.  The Supreme Court held that relief was unavailable under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act … Continue Reading

The Trend Toward The Use of Summary Dispositions

We have previously reported on the Sixth Circuit’s caseload and the trend toward the use of unpublished opinions.  We’ve discussed that the number of published decisions per judge, the opinions that are the most important to create precedent, are fairly consistent throughout all circuits.  But the latest statistics show an interesting trend toward the use … Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Reverses ERISA Premption Decision

In Gardner v. Heartland Industrial Partners, LP, the Sixth Circuit reversed a decision that held that the plaintiffs’ state law tort claims for tortious interference with contract were completely preempted by ERISA.  The Sixth Circuit framed the question as one of jurisdiction – in other words, whether plaintiffs’ complaint stated a federal question allowing defendants … Continue Reading

In A Question Of First Impression, the Sixth Circuit Holds That An Electronic Filing Error Does Not Doom A Party’s Appeal

We’re all too familiar with them:  Electronic filing mistakes in the Case Management and Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system (now adopted by every Circuit).  They include everything from filing in the wrong case to submitting the wrong document.  And we’re just as familiar with corrected electronic docket entries.  As we all know, the CM/ECF system does … Continue Reading
LexBlog