Header graphic for print
6th Circuit Appellate Blog Tagline

Monthly Archives: May 2012

Overturning Precedent Of A “Dubious Vintage,” The Sixth Circuit Reinstates Ohio’s Small Emitters Exemption To The Clean Air Act

Posted in Recent Cases

The Sixth Circuit reinstated Ohio’s small air emission source exemption to the best available technology rule (“BAT”) in Sierra Club v. Christopher Korleski (No. 10-3269).  Under the Clean Air Act, states must create state implementation plans (“SIPs”) to meet certain air quality standards. If the EPA approves the state’s proposal, the SIP becomes federal law, and any… Continue Reading

A Texas Sized Trademark Decision for the Sixth Circuit

Posted in Uncategorized

In T. Marzetti Company v Roskam Baking Company , the Sixth Circuit decided that the mark “Texas Toast” is not entitled to trademark protection for a specific type of crouton.  Following closely on the heels of the Circuit’s recent Maker’s Mark trademark ruling, the Court continues to develop its jurisprudence on trademark infringement issues, particularly in the context of… Continue Reading

BREAKING: Sixth Circuit En Banc Court Adopts New Standard For Proving Discrimination Under the ADA, But In A Bold Move Refuses To Adopt The Standard Followed By A Supermajority Of Circuit Courts

Posted in En Banc Watch

Earlier today in its en banc decision in Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., No. 09-6381 (PDF), the Sixth Circuit unanimously overruled the standard set forth in its 16 year-old decision in Monette v. Electronic Data Systems Corp., 990 F.3d 1173 (6th Cir. 1996), which required a plaintiff bringing a discrimination claim under the Americans with… Continue Reading

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Frequent Fliers’ Claims

Posted in News and Analysis

The Supreme Court has declined to hear Simon v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Case No. 11-1150, a putative class action brought by frequent flier members against Continental Airlines, Inc.  Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that Continental breached the terms of their frequent flyer agreements by unilaterally changing the terms of the agreements and charging more miles than advertised… Continue Reading

WHIRLPOOL SEEKS EN BANC REVIEW OF PANEL’S DECISION IN WASHING MACHINE LITIGATION

Posted in En Banc Watch

As we previously reported back on May 4, 2012, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit, relying heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2451 (2011), affirmed class certification in a multi-district litigation involving alleged design defects leading to mold and mildew in certain front-load washing machines… Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Upholds Finality of Insurance Settlements Against Non-settling Insurer

Posted in Recent Cases

The Sixth Circuit, in order to promote the finality of settlements, ruled against a non-settling insurer’s claim for equitable contribution against a settling insurer.  Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit released its opinion in OneBeacon America Insurance Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.  OneBeacon and AMICO were both insurers of B.F. Goodrich and, along with other insurers,… Continue Reading

Seventh Circuit Disagrees With the Sixth Circuit in Construing Compensable Time Under The Fair Labor Standards Act

Posted in News and Analysis, Recent Cases, Supreme Court

Last week, Judge Posner, writing on behalf of the Seventh Circuit, disagreed with the Sixth Circuit when examining whether, in cases where a collective bargaining agreement does not provide for compensation for the time a worker spends putting on protective clothing to start his shift, the time spent walking from the locker room to the work… Continue Reading

Michigan Company Appeals Decision Dismissing Claims Against Democratic Republic of the Congo Due to Sovereign Immunity

Posted in Recent Cases

On May 11, 2012, Triple A International, Inc., a Michigan corporation, appealed the decision of the Eastern District of Michigan dismissing Triple A’s claims to collect on a debt allegedly owed to it by the Democratic Republic of the Congo.  Triple A Int’l, Inc. v. The Democratic Republic of Congo, Case No. 10-15137.  In 1993,… Continue Reading

How Important Are Standards of Review?

Posted in News and Analysis

Appellate lawyers think about arguments in terms of the applicable standard of review, as that is the lens the court will use to evaluate an appeal.  There are four main standards of review:   Under “de novo” review, an appellate court decides an appeal without any deference to the lower court’s decision.   Review for “clear error”… Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Upholds Trademark Protection of Maker’s Mark Signature Red Dripping-Wax Seal

Posted in Recent Cases

In an opinion rich with the history of bourbon, the Sixth Circuit held that Maker’s Mark’s signature trade dress element of its trademark, the red dripping-wax seal, was due protection.  Maker’s Mark has used the red dripping-wax seal since 1958, and in 1980 registered a trademark of its trade dress.  In 2001, Jose Cuervo’s began… Continue Reading

When Is a Defendant Not a Defendant? Sixth Circuit Decides Important CAFA Removal Case

Posted in Recent Cases

The Sixth Circuit yesterday answered this question, holding that under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), a third-party defendant is not a “defendant” permitted to remove an underlying state court action to federal court.  In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Case No. 12-501 (PDF).  In reaching this conclusion, the Court joined the Fourth, Seventh… Continue Reading

Recent article questions the value of oral argument

Posted in Uncategorized

In a recent article by Adam Liptak in the New York Times, he noted that several commenters have questioned the value of oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court.  Needless to say, this matter is not confined to the Supreme Court, as we recently reported concerning the Sixth Circuit’s evolving thinking on the question of oral argument. … Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit upholds $59 million tax deduction

Posted in Uncategorized

In American Financial Group v. United States, the Sixth Circuit recently rejected an IRS appeal seeking a determination that a $59 million deduction taken by an insurance company was inappropriate.  The appeal ultimately turned on an actuarial guideline issued by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners concerning how insurance companies should handle accounting questions connected… Continue Reading

Dirty laundry: Sixth Circuit affirms class certification in washing machine litigation

Posted in Uncategorized

Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit affirmed class certification in an interlocutory appeal under Rule 23(f) in an MDL concerning alleged design defects in certain front-load washing machines produced by Whirlpool, In re: Whirpool Corporation Front-Loading Washing Products Liability Litigation.  The case involves washing machines that allegedly became susceptible to mold and mildew which allegedly led to… Continue Reading

“Can We Appeal That Now?” – Discretionary Interlocutory Appeals at the Sixth Circuit

Posted in News and Analysis

An often repeated question by litigants to their attorneys is whether an adverse ruling by the district court is subject to immediate appeal.  The answer to that question is, of course, highly circumstantial.  Depending on how their case is procedurally situated, in addition to the underlying substantive issues in some instances, litigants may or may… Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal Against Pro Se FDCPA Plaintiffs

Posted in News and Analysis, Recent Cases

In Lisa Bridge v. Ocwen Federal Bank, the Sixth Circuit reversed a dismissal in a FDCPA case brought by pro se plaintiffs regarding their mortgage.  Lisa Bridge, the only person listed on her mortgage, owed monthly payments to Aames Capital Corporation.  Her bank, Firstar, refused to honor her April mortgage check.  Thereafter, Lisa ordered Firstar… Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit upholds Fen-Phen convictions

Posted in Uncategorized

In United States v. Cunningham,  the Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of a pair of Kentucky lawyers related to the $200 million Fen-Phen settlement.  The Court’s opinion chronicles the actions of Shirley Cunningham, Jr. and William Gallion, who were lawyers representing 440 individuals who had opted out of a nationwide Fen-Phen class action.  While the lawyers succeeded… Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Finds Expert Testimony Improperly Excluded by District Court

Posted in Recent Cases

As we reported last week, a trend has emerged in the Sixth Circuit with expert witnesses facing difficult challenges so far this year.  Recently, however, one expert survived the more rigorous scrutiny.  In V&M Star Steel v. Centimark Corporation, (No. 10-3584) (V&M Star Steel.pdf), V&M sued Centimark Corporation (“Centimark”) alleging breach of contract and negligence stemming… Continue Reading